Cancelling cancel culture, a modest proposal….

For quite some time now, a cancer has been eating at the body of civil society. The cancer I refer to is that of ‘cancel culture’, where some anonymous complainants and their associated Twatter hate mob can pressure employers into firing an employee who has personal views the hate mob find objectionable. The problem is that once accused there appears to be no redress. There is no-one to sue for loss of income apart from the employers / source of revenue.

My own take on this is that if someone holds off beat views, or even objects quite reasonably to certain things, anonymous complaints are held to be evidence, which is an injustice of gargantuan proportions. No one should have that sort of power without some form of direct accountability. Either legal or fiscal.

Say if HR pulls you in and says that you’re fired because of a complaint against you pertaining to matters outside of your employment, first demand to know why, then insist upon being given details of the complaint against you, and the complainants details so that you can send your lawyers after them and sue them personally for the loss of income that they have occasioned. If the answer from HR is “It’s confidential.” Your automatic reply should be firstly “Why?” followed by “Who laid the complaint? All the names please. This is my right.” This is only fair. Your dismissal or ‘cancellation’ has now become a legal matter and is subject to the process of contract and civil law. And civil law has avenues for redress.

Only a tyrant exercises Quia sic dicit (Because I say so) as a guiding principle, and since we do not (At least superficially) live in a tyranny, there has to be some Quid pro quo (something for something). Anything less is injustice personified.

The kind of suit I allude to should be a massive business opportunity for all those ambulance chasing personal injury lawyers who should be all over this issue like fleas on a dogs back. Their marketing byline could be something like; “Anonymous complaints cost you your job or livelihood? Give us a call.” followed by a toll-free number. Could be a nice little earner.

I mention the above in a tongue in cheek manner, but this is deadly serious. Platforms who allow ‘cancel culture’ to flourish have, by their very actions, become complicit with the anonymous complainants and should therefore bear at least some of the financial consequences. By choosing to cancel some accounts and not others they cross the line between being merely a platform, a noticeboard which bears little or limited responsibility for the things posted upon it, and become publishers where they are seen to be exercising editorial control. Any platforms who enjoy the status of non-profit or charity should also lose their charitable tax status. Likewise employers who dismiss employees on the basis of anonymous complaints should bear some of the cost of punitive damages.

The anonymous complainants and the twatter hate mobs have been getting away with this shit for far too long. Payback time is long overdue.

Pass the popcorn, this might get interesting.

Addendum: The recently formed ‘Free Speech Union‘ looks useful. I wish them many successes.

Another Addendum: Patreon is in trouble. Watch Vlawgger Viva Frei’s take on the court case.

I’m currently listening to the world’s tiniest violin and chuckling darkly.

4 thoughts on “Cancelling cancel culture, a modest proposal….”

  1. I don’t know if you’re aware of this, but check out Voxday blogspot .com regarding Patreon vs the 72 bears, currently taking place. Patreon removed some content providers from their site for hate speech, following an sjw pile-on and the court case looks like it’s going very badly for Patreon. Of course there are no guarantees how it will end but it looks like there may be an opening against the tech giants. Well worth a look.


    1. I’ve heard that Patreon was in trouble, but wasn’t sure of the details. Patreon’s conduct in deleting accounts, and I’m told making money disappear, has been reprehensible. We can only hope that punitive damages are awarded against them and the lawyers fees bankrupt the bastards.

      There have to be consequences.


  2. I hope so , but firstly you should not be dismissed from your employment for matters not pertaining to your employer. It shouldn’t be any of their business what I do in my private life unless I am directly bringing them into disrepute ,they should be automatically found to have unfairly dismissed you. Thankfully I am not on things like Twitter or Facebook, they are just anti free speech.


    1. Agreed. No-one should be dismissed for non employment related conduct. But people have. The so called ‘morality police’ SJW’s and those who kowtow to them have to feel the solid sting of a financial penalty.


Comments are closed.