What conspiracies?

Sometimes I look at these blogs and view them with the same jaundiced eye that a bar regular looks at the visiting nutter. Especially those wide eyed innocents who repost the semi coherent crap about how 9/11 was ‘done by the government’ to justify some otherwise unpalatable turn of foreign policy or create a ‘casus belli‘.

All of these conspiracy theories are crap. Every last single one; from UFO’s, ‘chemtrails’ and black helicopters, to ‘who shot JFK’, faked moon landings and 9/11 being a demolition job. Even the assertions of ‘New world Order’ are little more than Politicians letting off esteem. As for the ‘club of Rome’, that document is aspirational more than anything else, so no, it lacks credence, as do those politicians who try and follow the principles. A bureaucratic edifice of such rigid construction will rapidly collapse under its own internal socio-economic pressures. As we can see happening right now. Like the old Soviet Union, such entities are too rigid and inflexible to survive for long.

Why do I make this bold assertion (sic) prey tell? Simple, because I understand logistics and processes. I’ve also trained as an Engineer. You know, worked with real materials and seen, first hand how they behave under various conditions. How breaking strains alter under differing heat and pressure conditions. I also understand (to a degree) the science of illusion, having spent some time on the fringes of the ‘creative’ industry as an AV technician. Ever seen a movie being made? A proper feature film? Pre and post production? Worked and talked with people who do special effects for a living and seen how they ‘fake’ it? Then taken a good long look at the credits list of a movie at the cinema? Yes, I’m one of the sad buggers who doesn’t leap up from their seat the minute the end credits pop up, because I’m looking for names I recognise in the first and second units and the whole army of people it takes to put a half way and not so decent movie together.

Having also spent a deal of my working life in the public sector, I know how driven by cock-up the whole process of Government, both at local and national level, is. Because it is made up of people. Not super humans, but ordinary working stiffs doing stuff ‘by the book’ which has been written by another working stiff who is mere mortal flesh like the rest of us. People who make mistakes, as we all do. People who talk about their work, who bunk off early because its Friday and hide their mistakes from the boss lest they get fired or disciplined. The result being that Government leaks like a sieve. Even the so-called ‘secret’ CIA leaks, the UK security services leak, Mossad, the Russians, the Chinese, everyone leaks. Sometimes these leaks are managed for the purposes of political ‘spin’ by politicians, who are no smarter than the rest of the Mark 1 Human being (Possibly more dishonest, self interested or devious, but definitely not smarter). Sometimes a guy in a bar will say something about what he does to impress a girl with the object of removing her lingerie. Without spending a whole life in hiding, there is no perfect secrecy.

A fortiori; we are gossips. It is human. Leaks happen. That is human. So how on earth does anyone expect an imperfect agency, to wit; Government, to be perfectly secret about hugely complex operations? Even the Atomic Bomb programme leaked back in the 40’s. Even with the ‘special services’; they might not talk, but their neighbours do. Comings and goings at odd hours are noticed. Oddities stand out from the patterns of everyday life. Changes in behaviour. For these big conspiracies to happen, there’s a whole logistic chain of fallible humans to link together. The bigger the event, the easier it is to pick up a trail.

Let us take the example of the ‘space race’ chronicled and filmed to perdition, and with the AV technology available at the time, impossible to fake. For proof, look at Hollywoods finest contemporary portrayals that would have used state of the art camera technology and direction techniques. Now compare with the footage shot by Armstrong, Aldrin, and all the other Apollo astronauts. Then work out how many people would have had to been in on the ‘fake’. It would have been far easier to go there than fart around making truly convincing fake footage. I believe Mr Aldrin still gets pretty steamed at being called a liar by the crazies, and I don’t blame him for punching one of them out. He should have stomped on the nasty fuckers head, and hang the consequences.

For 9/11, look at the physics of failure in a stressed steel skin constriction skyscraper. Faking those with explosives would have necessitated weeks of placing obviously linked explosive charges in offices where people were actually working. Controlled demolition requires (According to a Civil Engineer friend of mine) a lot of work which would not have gone unnoticed. Supporting pillars would have had to be drilled, the charges would have to be linked with stuff like cordex running everywhere to ensure that the charges all went off in the correct order. Far easier to ram a Jet Airliner into a building and let the intense heat of burning aviation spirit weaken the internal structures to the point where they undergo catastrophic failure and the mass of the top thirty or so stories drops at 9.81 metres per second, crushing the rest (Which increases the falling mass), and splitting the external stressed skin from the inside like a banana. All the way down to the basement. As for WTC7, that caught fire, and the fire suppression system couldn’t cope with the blaze. A structural failure on the 13th floor sealed the buildings fate and it collapsed. No need for any conspiracy. No tinfoil hat required.

As for constructing buildings with the object of such a demolition in mind, that would be asking for spontaneous structural failure during the first storms, never mind some spurious Government ‘black ops’ Agency. No Civil Engineer or Architect would design such a thing on purpose. On top of the damage to the building there would be the damage to your businesses reputation. You’d never work again. As for the ‘Drone’ theory, oh FFS! Look at drone technology for 2002. The only place you’d get the level averred to is out of Star Trek or Star Wars. So yes, 9/11 conspiracy theories are total bollocks.

My point here is that governments are largely blunt instruments, good for large scale stuff, but they are also untidy and obvious because they are made up of people. Homo (not so) Sapiens. As Douglas Adams once noted ‘people are a problem’, or rather he should have said that problems are often made up of people screwing up, then covering up, which being imperfect, they also make a mess of. Quod erat demonstrandum. Every single day, everywhere. Ain’t life grand?

8 thoughts on “What conspiracies?”

  1. Your theory that theory conspiracies are crap is a conspiracy theory in itself. If architects and engineers say that Building No7 was brought down by controlled explosions, then other architects and engineers swear that it was brought down by fire alone, who is to say which is true?, another group of architects and engineers and another and another.
    Do we rely upon consensus as THEY do with Climate
    Change, MMGW, AGW or whatever they call it nowadays.


  2. Leaks happen. That is human.

    Indeed, and that’s the big question that no theorist has ever given me a satisfactory answer to unless you count reiteration of one or more anomalies as an answer. It’s a bit like the god of the gaps – what science cannot explain is taken to be evidence of the involvement of god(s), and anything unexpected, inexplicable or anomalous (or even apparently but not really anomalous as with some aspects of Apollo) is taken as evidence that there must be a conspiracy. Some feel they’re being properly sceptical by questioning official versions of events, and to be fair they are, but they generally forget to be equally sceptical of their preferred theories and ask questions to test whether they’re even less plausible.

    Conspiracy theorists need to imagine that they themselves are heading the conspiracy and consider How many jobs are needed to be done to fulfil the conspiracy’s objectives? How many people will each task take? For what period of time? How many other people might potentially observe and report on this and so need to be either brought into the conspiracy or induced to remain silent? What’s the cost? If you’re buying silence how do you persuade people not to alert others by suddenly flaunting unexplained wealth (and bear in mind that money someone can’t use may as well be money they don’t have)? What’s the object of the exercise and what benefit is that to you, the conspirators? What are the risks to you if it leaks and the operation is blown? Is the risk/reward ratio worth it? Is there an easier way of accomplishing your objective or is the course of action that you hope will look to the world like a lone sniper/space rocket/car crash/Islamic hijack/whatever event we’re talking about as a possible conspiracy the only way of doing it? With all that in mind could you be assured that the conspiracy will remain secret for ever, or even for however long it’s been since the event – 48 years for JFK, 42 for Apollo, 14 for the Diana car crash, a decade for 9/11, and so on?

    I’m quite happy to be sceptical of whatever a government is telling us but when you start asking those kind of questions the official versions look less implausible than any of the other theories, some of which necessarily imply vast numbers of people keeping their silence for many years and with no apparent reward for doing so.


  3. “drops at 9.81 metres per second” ? I think you mean “accelerates at 9.81 meters per second per second”


Comments are closed.